|
Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com
|
| |
CONTRIBUTIONS |
| |
| |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| a |
| Article (Thematic Issue): Confronting the FCC Net Neutrality Order with European Regulatory Principles |
| Monday 26 March 2012,
by
Winston J. Maxwell, Partner, Hogan Lovells LLP, resident in the Paris office, and Daniel L. Brenner, Partner, Hogan Lovells LLP, resident in the Washington DC office |
The FCC’s 2010 “open Internet” (net neutrality) order went into effect on November 20, 2011. Verizon Communications and Metro PCS have challenged the FCC Order in court, alleging that the FCC lacked statutory power to impose net neutrality rules in connection with Internet access services. |
|
Communication act
Electronic communication
Europe
European directives
Federal communication commission (FCC)
Internet access
National rule
Net neutrality
Non-discrimination
Technological neutrality
United-States
Verizon
|
  |
| ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| a |
| Annual Symposium of the Journal of Regulation : La régulation sans géographie ?, March 22, 2012 |
| Thursday 22 March 2012,
by
The Journal of Regulation |
Traditionally regulated sectors, such as energy and telecommunications, have a very strong local roots, which made them at first dominated by the States even if they were developed by companies, because of the link between the State and territory. Furthermore, the market, which is a space defined by the activities and not necessarily by a territory, was superimposed on the overall economic. When observing the phenomena taking place in new territories, for example the euro area, but more what looks like spaces without territoriality, such as the Internet, or finance, geography seems to disappear. The dynamism of operators led by its own strength to the formation of new geographies which owe nothing to the kind or normative power of the States, as in energy infrastructure. However, to date, there have been in a regulatory report with respect to geography or based on geography. Could we diagnose the disappearance of geography or processing thereof such that the regulations themselves must be radically transformed? It is this question which is the subject of this symposium. |
|
|
  |
| ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| a |
| Thematic Report (Agriculture, Environment, Healthcare): The French ban on GMOs declared illegal by the "Conseil d’Etat" (French Council of State). Yet, the interdiction will be perpetuated, Ministers said. |
| Wednesday 8 February 2012,
by
Lorraine Boris, Junior Editor |
On November 28th, 2011, the "Conseil d’Etat" (French Council of State) ruled that the ban on GMOs established by several ministerial decrees in December 2007 and February 2008 is not valid. The main reason for this decision is the lack of sufficient proof given by the French government that GMOs represent a high threat for public health or the environment. Yet, the French Ministers of Agriculture and Environment declared on January 13th, 2012, that the same prohibition will be adopted. |
|
Agriculture
Burden of proof
CONSEIL d’ETAT
Danger
Egality
Environment
Equality
European court of justice
French council of State
Genetic modification
GMO
Governmental agency
Independence
Member State
Ministerial decree
Monsanto
Proove
Protection of public health
Risk
Subsidiary
|
  |
| ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... |
|
|
| |
| |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|